(Un)intended consequences: a social sciences stocktake of a decade of Global Action Plan-inspired antimicrobial governance

  27 January 2026

The article examines how efforts over the past decade to govern and respond to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through policy, awareness campaigns and global coordination have sometimes produced unintended effects—including mixed public understanding, behavioural responses that don’t align with stewardship goals, and governance gaps that hinder effective action. It argues that incorporating social science perspectives more systematically into AMR strategies can help identify and mitigate these unintended consequences, improve communication and behaviour change efforts, and strengthen policies so they better align with real-world contexts and public health outcomes.

Further reading: The Lancet Microbe
Author(s): Claas Kirchhelle et al
Effective Surveillance  
Back

OUR UNDERWRITERS

Unrestricted financial support by:

Antimicrobial Resistance Fighter Coalition

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURERS & ASSOCIATIONS

BD





AMR NEWS

Your Biweekly Source for Global AMR Insights!

Stay informed with the essential newsletter that brings together all the latest One Health news on antimicrobial resistance. Delivered straight to your inbox every two weeks, AMR NEWS provides a curated selection of international insights, key publications, and the latest updates in the fight against AMR.

Don’t miss out on staying ahead in the global AMR movement—subscribe now!

Subscribe
What is going on with AMR?
Stay tuned with remarkable global AMR news and developments!